10 Worst Movies in 2009 You Wish You Hadn't Seen in Theaters

So how do you make $300 million look kinda cool but completely boring? Stephen Sommers, you have now answered that question. This was a horrible waste of time and money for both the studio and the viewer, but I'm pretty sure in a year or two we'll see a sequel. Not only did I not care about any of the characters, but the logic behind everything was both needlessly complex and incredibly stupid. If you blow up an iceberg it won't sink, because it's made of ice.

When I go to a movie, i don't want to see a clingy obliviously obsessed woman, that's why I ducked into the theater in the first place. Sandra Bullock's character is so unlikeable in this movie that it was uncomfortable, and it hurt more that you paid to feel that way.

Regardless of if you thought this was a good movie or not, the fact that you dropped $20 (you and your whiny kid) to see Eddie Murphy's giant creepy head for an hour and a half was not pleasant. He made some of the creepiest faces I have ever seen, and that was just in the trailer, at regular size.

If you're not seven, then the only thing you're thinking during this film is, "Why Steve Martin, why? Do you need money that badly?". It's really no surprise though, since he hasn't done a funny movie since 'Planes, Trains, and Automobiles'.

Regardless of if the movie is actually any good, I will never want to sit in the middle of a theater full of screaming pubescent girls lusting after a guy that looks like he spent the night in a trash can.