films The Best Movies That Were Originally Panned by Critics  

14k votes 1.7k voters 168k views 16 items Follow Embed

List Rules Upvote your favorite movie that was panned by critics. Only add films that received a negative critical response.

Ranker Video v 8 Classic Movies Critics Originally Hated
Sometimes, even acclaimed film critics make hasty conclusions about new movies. Some of the best movies that were originally panned by critics turned out to be some of the most famous and beloved films of all time. Some films were released with mixed reviews, while others totally bombed. In the end, however, fan support made all the difference in these films' popularity.

When it comes down to it, critics have a subjective opinion, just like every member of the audience. Critics also tend to be more cynical and biased towards films that are breaking new ground, because they have seen so many movies in their lives. A lot of these great movies that were initially hated on by critics withstood the test of time, or were adopted by audiences as their favorites.

A lot of the films on this list were missed by critics because they were expecting something and got something else entirely. This is the case with Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas and Predator. Critics claimed that there was no plot in either movie, and that they lacked real story-telling structure. The reasons why audience members like these movies, however, had nothing to do with a well-put together plot line. Many people enjoyed them because of their unique exploration of a subculture, or graphic action sequences.

Not all movies are instant classics. Some require the kindness of time to look more appealing, or the interest of a select group of fans to turn the movie into a cult classic. Who knows? Baz Luhrmann's 2013 version of The Great Gatsby may just have a chance after all.
1
+ - 815 184

The Shining


The Shining is listed (or ranked) 1 on the list The Best Movies That Were Originally Panned by Critics
Photo: Freebase/Public domain

Kubrick is good at making movies that everyone dislikes, realizes that they were chumps for disliking it, and then pretends to have liked all along. For example, Roger Ebert gave the movie a bad review, only to go back on it later.

Variety regarded the film as a destruction of everything that made the Stephen King book terrifying, and said that Shelley Duvall “transforms the warm sympathetic wife of the book into a simpering, semi-retarded hysteric.” In fact – Shelley was nominated for a Razzie for worst actress for the role, along with – for reals – Kubrick for worst director! Wow.

In fairness – the movie was probably the worst adaptation when you think about, and by ‘worst’ I mean least loyal. Hell – Jack doesn’t even have an ax in the book, but rather a mallet. But hey – can you imagine if Kubrick kept that in? 

Rotten Tomatoes score: 88%, 8.5/10

Also Ranked

#8 on The Best Psychological Thrillers of All Time

#71 on The Most Rewatchable Movies

#26 on Horror Movie Set-Ups You'd Least Like to Be Trapped In

#10 on The Most Nausea-Inducing Great Films

see more on The Shining
2
+ - 678 175

The Wizard of Oz


The Wizard of Oz is listed (or ranked) 2 on the list The Best Movies That Were Originally Panned by Critics
Photo:  uploaded by Ranker Film

“I sat cringing before MGM’s Technicolor production of The Wizard of Oz, which displays no trace of imagination, good taste, or ingenuity… I don’t like the Singer Midgets under any circumstances, but I found them especially bothersome in Technicolor… I say it’s a stinkeroo.” – Russell Maloney, The New Yorker

Rotten Tomatoes score: 99%, 9.4/10

Also Ranked

#4 on The Best Musical Movies of All Time

#4 on Musical Movies With the Best Songs

#92 on The Greatest Film Scores of All Time

#14 on The Greatest Soundtracks of All Time

see more on The Wizard of Oz
3
+ - 546 162

Psycho


Psycho is listed (or ranked) 3 on the list The Best Movies That Were Originally Panned by Critics
Photo: Freebase/Public domain

Upon its release, the reviews for this movie weren’t all terrible but rather just so-so. It's rise to Classic Film status just goes to show that if a film strikes a chord with the public, its greatness can't be denied. 

At the time though – the film was “plainly a gimmick movie”, and even a “blot on an honorable career.” In a particularly pretentiously written review, the New York Times said it had “not an abundance of subtlety” and was an “obviously low-budget job.” No one hated it – but no one thought it to be anything all that special either. 

Rotten Tomatoes score: 96%, 9.2/10

Also Ranked

#22 on The Greatest Film Scores of All Time

#6 on The Best Psychological Thrillers of All Time

#38 on The Greatest Movie Themes

#3 on The Best Scary Movies Based on True Stories

see more on Psycho
4
+ - 580 214

Fight Club


Fight Club is listed (or ranked) 4 on the list The Best Movies That Were Originally Panned by Critics
Photo:  uploaded by Ranker Film

New York Daily News called it “hardly groundbreaking,” the Miami Herald referred to it as “a bit of a dud,” and the Boston Globe said that its “chic indictment of empty materialist values fizzles.” 

Rotten Tomatoes score: 79%, 7.3/10

Also Ranked

#39 on The Very Best Oscar-Winning Movies

#4 on The Best Psychological Thrillers of All Time

#29 on The Most Rewatchable Movies

#9 on The Best Movies Where the Bad Guy Wins

see more on Fight Club