The 13 Dumbest Lawsuits in Recent History Anything

The 13 Dumbest Lawsuits in Recent History

WilliamMtx WilliamMtx 147,864 views 13 items
We live in a litigious world and, more importantly, one filled with scam artists and cry babies looking for any excuse to blame their mistakes, problems or minor shortcomings on bigger companies. Here are thirteen cases that will make you want to sue the pants off of someone instead of, you know, "working".
< >
Show:   5   25 View:
More Options
  1. 1

    Man Sues Dry Cleaners for $67 Million for Losing Pants

    "I'll sue the pants off you!"... literally.

    A Washington, D.C. judge took his pants to get dry-cleaned at a family-owned business called Custom Cleaners. According to him, they never returned the correct pair of pants, and betrayed their "satisfaction guaranteed" sign in their store.

    This served as enough reason to sue the business for 67 million dollars for losing his pants a.k.a. the most expensive pants in the history of pants.

    Although later on, he was gracious enough to drop the case down to only, just only, 54 millions dollars -- what a nice guy, right?

    Lawsuit language has never sounded so beautiful. Roy Pearson, the offended pants-man, passionately describes his œmental suffering, inconvenience and discomfort at the hands of a business where "never before in recorded history have a group of defendants engaged in such misleading and unfair business practices" to the judge. Basically, life without pants has been hell.

    Pearson continued his tirade, always referring to himself as we (until the judge corrected him), in hopes he could get the thousands of Americans who are subject to "satisfaction guaranteed" signs to stand up and fight for their rights for quality service.

    The case ended with the dry-cleaner owner holding up a pair of pressed pants, facing the judge, the jury and the plaintiff, and delivering the final blow to Pearson's case. "These are your pants", he said. Pearson ran out of the testimony, tears streaming down his face, shocked at such an injustice. To this day, he denies that those are his pants.

    The epic 4 page story on ABC's website .
  2. 2

    Woman Sues Google Maps for Bad Directions

    It's official. Technology has replaced all common sense and brain function. Curse you, Google. We are helpless without you. And especially helpless if you are Lauren Rosenberg.

    The specifics of this story involve Rosenberg trying to walk from 96 Daly Street, Park City, Utah, to 1710 Prospector Avenue, Park City, Utah, using Google maps on her BlackBerry as her guide. A part of the Google directions she got involved a half-mile walk down Deer Valley Drive. When she got there, she found that the road itself had no pedestrian pathway or sidewalks. Why? Because Deer Valley Drive was also known as Utah State Route 224.

    However, Rosenberg continued following directions and started walking right down a major, major higway with a lot of high-speeding cars. When she got hit by one, she sued Google for leading her there. She demanded 100,000 dollars, claiming the directions were unreasonable and unsafe, despite the fact the road was obviously unfit for pedestrians and that upon the map, Google clearly marks Route 224 as a major thoroughfare. Rosenberg apparently never saw the side roads she could have used. Nor did she pay attention that Google posts a warning about the safety and reliability of its directions with every map search.

    To be fair, the warning apparently never shows up in cellphones or when giving directions. And apparently it doesn't show up in people's brains either. It has come to the point where if Google tells you to walk into the middle of a heavily-used highway, so be it.

    Source.
  3. 3

    Woman Sues Halloween Horror Nights Because It Was "Too Scary"

    A woman sued Universal Studios because it was causing her "œemotional distress". The distress in question happened when Cleanthi Peters and her granddaughter exited a ride to find an employee with a chainsaw leaping out of the dark and chasing them out of the ride.

    They swore that Leatherface was attacking them in the middle of public, like any logical human being attending an event at a park that markets itself as the scariest experience you'll ever have at a theme park and often features headlining attractions such as 3D Saw-style torture and a haunted house filled with your darkest fears.

    Screaming, they ran out of the ride, out onto the park and slipped on a wet spot, leaving them helpless when Leatherface caught up to them and brandished his chainsaw in their faces. There was much crying and hugging and praying galore and there probably were some clothes that needed to be changed.

    Instead of feeling thankful of being alive, the woman turned around and sued the park for $15,000 dollars. Why didn't she win? Well, only because the park was going through "Halloween Horror Nights" and they "alley" where this happened was the Haunted House.

    "The line for this bathroom is really long-oooooh My GOD!"

    Source.
  4. 4

    Man Sues Anheuser-Busch For Showing Hot Women Get Attracted To Normal Guys

    In 1991, a man named Richard Overton sued Anheuser-Busch, maker of beers like Budweiser and Bud Light, in light that their advertisements featuring guys scoring with beautiful women do not illustrate the reality that consuming beer will not get you laid.

    His concern for the public seems to be pretty evident as clause by clause, he accuses the beer maker of lying to society in order to get them to buy their products and promote the false belief that beer is necessary for social interaction between the sexes. This "false" belief is harmful to society, said the naturally-funny-at-parties Samaritan.

    But then the lawsuit turns to its last page, where it claims the advertisements caused poor Overton emotional and physical distress along with financial losses of 10,000 dollars. Sounds like a pretty personal case. The compensation demanded 250 dollars for every day Anheuser-Busch continues to air these ads.

    The lawsuit never describes what personal damage was inflicted by Anheuser-Busch onto Overton, though its easy to imagine he tried to emulate one of the ads and ended up getting sick of hypothermia when trying to cool beers on icy mountains. Or maybe he tried hitting on women over and over again drunk on Bud Light until one of them finally gave it to him straight-up cold, leaving him brutally exposed to the harsh reality that advertisements are not a real depiction of life.

    Read his official complaint here (PDF warning.)
  5. 5

    Suicidal Person Sues Subway Train Authority

    The first time Milo Stephens Jr. tried to commit suicide, he did it by jumping in front of subway train as it pulled into an East Manhattan station way back in 1977. He didn't die, but the aftermath was pretty brutal. We'll just say Stephens didn't emerge from the incident in one piece.

    A few months later, the family was able to find an "enterprising personal injury lawyer" who gave a whole new meaning to the term personal injury in legal circumstances. With his help, the family sued the New York City Transit Authority for 650,000 dollars in the guise that the driver of the train did not slow down the car in time and thus was to blame for injuring Stephens, even though he willingly put himself in harm's way.

    Astonishingly, they won and the personal injuries weren't so personal anymore.

    Strangely, Stephens tried to kill himself again using the same method in 1982, which means that either he needs serious medical help, or burned through that money faster than MC Hammer. Fortunately, New York didn't have anything to worry about as there was no severe "personal damage" this time.

    Source.

items 1 - 5 of 13

leave a comment

comments powered by Disqus
  1. 729301038
    The 13 Dumbest Lawsuits in Recent History at 1/30/2013 10:30 PM
    Was trying to learn more relative to dumbest lawsuits .
  2. Ewa Saleeby
    The 13 Dumbest Lawsuits in Recent History at 9/11/2012 9:30 AM
    Worthy dumbest lawsuitsthing here.
  3. Jim Stevens
    The 13 Dumbest Lawsuits in Recent History at 2/03/2012 12:08 AM
    Check this one out!

    http://www.laweekly.com/2012-02-02/news/dino-m-zaffina-southern-california-darts-association/
  4. Sonic
    The 13 Dumbest Lawsuits in Recent History at 9/01/2011 7:28 PM
    man these thing are funny
  5. burnedbymcdonald
    McDonalds and Its Coffee at 12/05/2010 5:39 AM
    If McDonalds hadn't been serving scalding hot coffee, much hotter than the normal serving temperature, Stella would not have received such severe burns, and wouldn't have required skin grafts. And this was exactly the reason for the jury's prudent damage award to Stella.
    1. Dead Serious
      McDonalds and Its Coffee at 12/05/2010 6:08 PM
      Please. If she hadn't (rather stupidly) put it between her legs she also wouldn't have received ANY burns. It's a sad thing that happened, to be sure, but this was her fault, not taking proper care with the coffee. She could have waited, she could have had the driver pull over, she could have put it on a cup holder or the floor, where--even if it spilled--it wouldn't have burned anyone. She didn't. This is her negligence. If you're texting while driving and you get into an accident, you don't hold ATT or Verizon responsible for your own thoughtlessness. If you plant your hand on a hot stove burner, you don't blame Hotpoint or Kenmore because it was hotter than you thought it was. Whatever the temperature of McDonald's coffee, it was a consistent temperature, so unless she had never had coffee from there before (which I find hard to believe) she should have some idea of how hot it is. Dear God, what ever happened to personal responsibility??
  6. Law Student
    McDonalds and Its Coffee at 12/04/2010 8:11 AM
    It is worth noting that the plaintiff in this case did not sue McDonald's for such an exorbitant amount - She sued for her medical expenses for the third degree burns, and the jury awarded a huge punitive damages reward on top of the expenses the plaintiff requested. The reason the jury rewarded the punitive damages was because it was shown in court that McDonald's had had other cases where people burned themselves badly, and decided the small amount of litigation they might face was not worth adjusting their nationwide standard for coffee temps. So, basically, if McD's had just fixed the problem when they first learned about it, the woman would most likely not have been burned. She had to get skin grafts on her hoo-ha. I think she deserved a few bucks for that.
    1. Dead Serious
      McDonalds and Its Coffee at 12/04/2010 12:25 PM
      Yeah, but it's also worth noting that if she just hadn't put the coffee between her thighs (like countless millions of others seem to be able to do), she also wouldn't have burned said hoo-ha. Lawsuits should punish negligence, not reward stupidity.
  7. John
    The 13 Dumbest Lawsuits in Recent History at 12/03/2010 8:38 AM
    How can you not have any of Jonathan Lee Riches cases... anyone of them from suing Michael Vick to Brittany Spears... and everything in between!
    1. Sonic
      The 13 Dumbest Lawsuits in Recent History at 9/01/2011 7:28 PM
      wow i agree
  8. leghound
    Why Does This Taser Fire Bullets? at 12/03/2010 7:59 AM
    Funny the only time I was arrested for a traffic fine I sat in the back seat and talked to the driver in a pleasant conversation.I guess if I'd endangered the Cops life they'd have kicked my ASS.What go round come around Dead Guy that was shot.
  9. Lauren
    The 13 Dumbest Lawsuits in Recent History at 12/03/2010 7:19 AM
    More facts on the McDonalds case:

    McDonalds had been warned several times before that their coffee was too hot for consumption. McDonalds produced documents showing more than 700 claims by people burned by its coffee between 1982 and 1992. Some claims involved third-degree burns substantially similar to Liebecks. Liebecks suffered third degree burns to her thighs, butt, stomach and freaking genitals. Let that sink in... Third degree burns on her genitals... She totally earned that case.

    They serve their coffee at 185 degrees when coffee is normally served at 145 degrees. 180 degrees is the magic number for a third degree burn. If the coffee had been at the normal temp, she would have been okay.

    www.lectlaw.com/files/cur78.htm

today on Ranker