Best Movies The Best Movies That Were Originally Panned by Critics  

Ranker Film
20.6k votes 2.5k voters 201.2k views 23 items

List Rules Upvote your favorite movie that was panned by critics. Only add films that received a negative critical response.

Sometimes, even acclaimed film critics make hasty conclusions about new movies. Some of the best movies that were originally panned by critics turned out to be some of the most famous and beloved films of all time. Some films were released with mixed reviews, while others totally bombed. In the end, however, fan support made all the difference in these films' popularity.

When it comes down to it, critics have a subjective opinion, just like every member of the audience. Critics also tend to be more cynical and biased towards films that are breaking new ground, because they have seen so many movies in their lives. A lot of these great movies that were initially hated on by critics withstood the test of time, or were adopted by audiences as their favorites.

A lot of the films on this list were missed by critics because they were expecting something and got something else entirely. This is the case with Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas and Predator. Critics claimed that there was no plot in either movie, and that they lacked real story-telling structure. The reasons why audience members like these movies, however, had nothing to do with a well-put together plot line. Many people enjoyed them because of their unique exploration of a subculture, or graphic action sequences.

Not all movies are instant classics. Some require the kindness of time to look more appealing, or the interest of a select group of fans to turn the movie into a cult classic. Who knows? Baz Luhrmann's 2013 version of The Great Gatsby may just have a chance after all.
The Shining is listed (or ranked) 1 on the list The Best Movies That Were Originally Panned by Critics
Photo: Warner Bros.
1 1,434 VOTES

Stanley Kubrick is good at making movies that everyone dislikes, realizes that they were chumps for disliking it, and then pretends to have liked all along. For example, Roger Ebert gave The Shining a bad review, only to go back on it later.

Variety regarded the film as a destruction of everything that made the Stephen King book terrifying, and said that Shelley Duvall “transforms the warm sympathetic wife of the book into a simpering, semi-retarded hysteric.” In fact, Shelley was nominated for a Razzie for worst actress for the role, along with, no joke, Kubrick for worst director! Wow.

In fairness, the movie wasn't exactly loyal to the source material. Jack doesn’t even have an ax in the book, but rather a mallet. But hey – can you imagine if Kubrick kept that in?

Also Ranked

#10 on The Best Movies Based on Books

#6 on The Best Psychological Thrillers of All Time

#65 on The Most Rewatchable Movies

#18 on The Best '70s Movies

More The Shining

A Timeline Of The Beef Between Stephen King And Stanley Kubrick Over 'The Shining' The Making Of 'The Shining' Was A Bigger Nightmare Than The Film's Story
1,160 274
Great movie?
The Wizard of Oz is listed (or ranked) 2 on the list The Best Movies That Were Originally Panned by Critics
Photo: MGM
2 1,291 VOTES

“I sat cringing before MGM’s Technicolor production of The Wizard of Oz, which displays no trace of imagination, good taste, or ingenuity… I don’t like the Singer Midgets under any circumstances, but I found them especially bothersome in Technicolor… I say it’s a stinkeroo.” – Russell Maloney, The New Yorker

Also Ranked

#8 on The Best Movies Based on Books

#58 on The Greatest Film Scores of All Time

#22 on The Most Rewatchable Movies

#14 on 'Old' Movies Every Young Person Needs To Watch In Their Lifetime

More The Wizard of Oz

'The Wizard Of Oz' Stars: Where Did They Go? The Original 'Wizard of Oz' Books Are Shockingly Violent Compared To The Judy Garland Classic
1,025 266
Great movie?
Psycho is listed (or ranked) 3 on the list The Best Movies That Were Originally Panned by Critics
Photo: Universal/Paramount
3 1,047 VOTES

Upon its release, the reviews for Psycho weren’t all terrible but rather just so-so. It's rise to Classic Film status just goes to show that if a film strikes a chord with the public, its greatness can't be denied.

At the time, though, the film was “plainly a gimmick movie,” and even a “blot on an honorable career.” In a particularly pretentiously written review, the New York Times said it had “not an abundance of subtlety” and was an “obviously low-budget job.” No one hated it, but no one thought it to be anything all that special either.

Also Ranked

#20 on The Best Movies Based on Books

#8 on The Best Psychological Thrillers of All Time

#25 on The Greatest Film Scores of All Time

#42 on The Best Intelligent Horror Movies

801 246
Great movie?
see more on Psycho
Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Fa... is listed (or ranked) 4 on the list The Best Movies That Were Originally Panned by Critics
Photo: Warner Bros.

The 1971 film Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory made a modest amount at the box office, but critics hated how it deviated from the source material. Author Roald Dahl even disowned the movie in protest to the changes that were made to the story.

Over time, thanks to repeated showings on television and strong home media sales, it became more of a hit and is now thought to be a quintessential family film.

Also Ranked

#14 on The Best Movies Based on Books

#67 on The Most Rewatchable Movies

#26 on The Best '70s Movies

#28 on The Best Musical Movies of All Time

More Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory

Strange Stories From Behind The Scenes Of Willy Wonka And The Chocolate Factory
289 57
Great movie?