The Internet is full of images and maps that conspiracy theorists think "prove" whatever plot they've decided is real, from the current controversy over the Jade Helm 15 military exercise to FEMA camps to the "Face on Mars." Almost all of these maps and images are real, but either taken massively out of context or willfully lied about. Thus, a simple map of wave heights becomes a chart of radiation spikes, or a picture of a labor camp in North Korea is deduced to be a labor camp in Wyoming.Here are the most well known pictures and maps from the conspiracy theory community, all thought to have something to do with an evil plot to take away our freedom. However, all of them are really just easily explainable pictures of something innocuous.
Shortly after the meltdown at the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant in March 2011, a picture started going around the Internet and was even printed in a number of mainstream news publications. It’s a map of what looks like a plume of red spewing forth from Japan, crossing the Pacific Ocean and making landfall all over the eastern part of the world. Both opponents of nuclear power and tinfoil hat-wearing paranoids thought the map was of radiation from the meltdown.But it’s not - it’s a map of wave heights of the tsunami that swamped the Fukushima plant after the earthquake. The map itself holds a few clues. First, it’s branded with the logo of NOAA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, who have nothing at all to do with studying radiation. The second is that radiation doesn’t stop and vanish when it hits land.
Chances are, someone you follow on Facebook is a “chemtrails” believer. This is a person who thinks the contrails that float behind an airplane aren’t tiny ice crystals caused by hot jet exhaust hitting cold air, but actually the traces of mysterious chemicals sprayed by the government to make us sick and/or control the weather. They will often cite pictures not just of planes in the air “spraying” but airplanes filled with mysterious barrels full of what must be horrible liquid.However, given that the chemtrails conspiracy has never actually been proven with compelling evidence, these tanks must be something else. And they are – they’re ballast tanks filled with water used to simulate the shifting weight of passengers and cargo during the testing of new jet plane frames.
Jade Helm 15 is the latest conspiracy theory that involves Obama sending troops into “patriotic” areas of the US to institute martial law, under the guise of a military exercise. As part of the plot, believers have seized on a map of the exercise and claimed it’s full of secret jargon and what states will be taken first.The Jade Helm map is very real but taken way out of context. It’s a simply a map of how the exercise is laid out, with some states labeled “Hostile” (Texas and Utah) and others “Permissive” (Colorado, Nevada, and California). It’s also got an alphabet soup of jargon - which is common to anything involving the military. These states were selected because they have a variety of terrains and environments to train in, as well as a large amount of open land to work on.
A key element of the 9/11 truth movement is that the government not only planned and executed the attacks, but spent years conditioning the American people to accept the fiction they created. This was done through a technique called “predictive programming,” the inserting of images of the attacks into popular culture to subliminally dull Americans into thinking it’s possible for terrorists to crash airplanes into the World Trade Center, rather than what “really” happened.This is flawed on a number of levels. The first is that the WTC was one of the most recognizable landmarks in the world, and so was often used in entertainment as a generic target for attacks, especially in cartoons and comic books. Also, for every image that shows a "random" date of September 11 in popular culture (a few famous ones are in The Matrix and The Big Lebowski) there are uncountable works that show different random dates. The biggest issue is that there’s no evidence that predictive programming actually works, or even any agreed-upon technique by which to do it.