• Nostalgia

The Most Ridiculous '90s Boys Toy Lines

List RulesVote up the '90s toys for boys that were the biggest ripoffs

The '90s were, overall, a great time for boys toy lines. Marvel and DC got their first figures since the heyday of Secret Wars and Super Powers, Star Wars returned, Ninja Turtles were everywhere, and McFarlane Toys upped the ante on sculpting, opening up a whole new niche for older collectors and even R-rated toys.

But you don't get good without making mistakes along the way, and the road to collector heaven was paved with terrible intentions and even worse executions. While some toys were getting better and better, others were so terrible that even though you bought them then, you'd love to go back in time and tell your past self to save that money. Dumb '90s toys for boys were a figuratively a dime a dozen, but much more expensive in a literal sense.

Frankly, there was just a whole lot of bullsh*t going on.
  • 1
    173 VOTES

    Lara Croft (Toy Biz)

    Photo: eBay

    When the first Tomb Raider game came out, heroine Lara Croft became an instant pop-culture superstar. She was everything everybody liked about Indiana Jones, but with breasts. And even in a game world that was years away from photo-realism, hackers came up with "nude codes."

    Toy Biz tried to move quickly to capitalize on the love, and while the action figure they made sold quickly, it's a misshapen mess with an ugly caricature of a face and an awkward, bowlegged stance inherited from the Marvel figure whose parts she was reusing. Many, many toys of Lara have come since, but only this one actually made her unattractive.
    Was this a ripoff?
  • 2
    164 VOTES

    G.I. Joe: Street Fighter II

    Video: YouTube

    Street Fighter II was a hot property in the '90s. Even as its graphics may not have been as eye-popping as rival Mortal Kombat, Capcom's constant upgrades with new characters and new moves kept the game fresh and complex. And in an era when arcade versions were still always superior to the home cartridge version, kids stocked up on quarters for their next bid at buttonmashing supremacy.

    Toys should have been a no-brainer. Instead, the first Street Fighter II figures on U.S. shores were designed by someone seemingly without a brain. Repainted G.I. Joe bodies that sometimes bore no resemblance to the game designs combined with newly sculpted heads, and racks full of weapons that were in no way game accurate.

    A second series actually included some original sculpts, and a few more were added for a tie-in with the Jean-Claude Van Damme movie. But compared to what fans got years later from companies like ReSaurus and SOTA, these really were a scam. Ha-BOO!-ken.
    Was this a ripoff?
  • 3
    134 VOTES

    Mortal Kombat

    Video: YouTube

    Everybody thought it was good  news when Hasbro announced they were doing Mortal Kombat figures. Surprise! They ended up being bullshit G.I. Joe repaints! This time around, though, at least they weren't branded as G.I. Joe, so that venerable toy could be spared one embarrassment in a decade otherwise full of them.

    Kids bought them anyway, mostly just so their bullsh*t Street Fighter Joes could fight them. RIPOFF-ALITY!
    Was this a ripoff?
  • 4
    118 VOTES

    G.I. Joe Extreme

    Video: YouTube

    EXTREEEEME! Following the misfire of Sgt. Savage, G.I. Joe received another '90s-style reboot. The result was probably exactly as stereotypical as you'd imagine from the name: hugely 'roided-up, overmuscular heroes with "Ultra-Slam Fire Power!" taking on terrorists in skull masks led by the evil Iron Klaw. Also - and this hurt the most - they had barely any articulation.

    Rob Liefeld gets away with this aesthetic because he created it. Hasbro doing it felt like cynical trend-hopping. Kids bought Toy Biz action figures of Deadpool and Cable instead.
    Was this a ripoff?