If you’ve been keeping up with our weekly coverage of the Trump administration’s seemingly interminable downward spiral, then you’ve no doubt noticed that the White House has a funny way of dealing with the past. Since the days of the campaign (and probably well before then if we're honest), Trump's understanding of American history has been spotty at best, which puts his press team in between a rock and a hard place when they have to attempt to translate his ramblings. Listening to Trump on history is like listening to a child talk about what they learned in school that day. His speeches are filled with incoherent ramblings that are baffling at best, and factually bankrupt at worst.
The Trump administration has reconstructed history through their particular lens, and, by doing so, they whitewash significant events while attempting to turn America into a kind of GOP Disneyland. When Trump’s chief of staff John Kelly discussed the Civil War with Fox News, he pushed aside the notion that the war was fought over slavery – which it was – and claimed that it was about a "lack of compromise." This line of thought is offensive on a molecular level, and it also shows the depths that the Trump White House will go to in order to realign history with its values.
In a few instances, there have been Trump staff resignations over how bad his employees have been at lying to the American people and the press, but unfortunately, everyone that’s left in the White House seems to be A-OK with just making stuff up. Steel yourself, and keep reading to find out all the ways that the Trump administration is wrong about history. Brought to you by the administration that coined "alternative facts."
Sean Spicer Claims Hitler Never Used Chemical Weapons
On April 11, 2017, Sean Spicer didn't just shove his foot in his mouth. He somehow managed to swallow himself whole, leaving nothing more than a pin-sized hole where the former Press Secretary once stood. After President Bashar al-Assad of Syria used sarin gas to attack a village, Spicer claimed that al-Assad was worse than Hitler because Hitler, at least, didn't use chemical weapons.
Spicer's statement ignores the fact that Hitler used gas chambers to commit genocide during the Holocaust. To make matters worse, Spicer said all of this in the middle of Passover.
Donald Trump Claims That He Wasn't All For The Iraq War When He Definitely Was
This lie technically happened prior to Trump's presidency, but it's so in your face that it has to be discussed. At a 2016 Indiana campaign stop, Trump claimed that he was against the Iraq war from the very beginning. He told his audience, “It should have never happened,” as Indiana Gov. Mike Pence stood by his side. “I didn’t want to go from the beginning, and I have proof – from the beginning. I didn’t want Iraq. I said you’re going to destabilize the Middle East, and that’s exactly what happened.” But here's the thing, in 2002, six months before the Iraq war, Trump appeared on The Howard Stern Show and said that said that he supported invading the Middle East.
This is also the guy who claims that he saw Muslims cheering during 9/11, so what else do you expect? If you want to drive yourself extra crazy, watch Donald Trump perform verbal gymnastics to Anderson Cooper in order to try and get around the fact that he was all for invading the Middle East.
They Claim Their Tax Plan Is The Biggest Tax Cut In The History Of The US
Throughout the 2016 campaign, Trump touted a massive tax plan that was going to be "so huge" that it would save the economy. When he finally revealed his planned tax cuts, it turned out that his reform plans weren't actually all that great.
In fact, his tax plan didn't even stack up to previous tax plans by presidents of both parties. Reuters reports that Regan was able to lower tax rates by 60%, and both presidents Harding and Coolidge were able to cut taxes by almost 66%. On the blue side of the aisle, Kennedy was able to lower taxes by 23%, which is nowhere near what Coolidge did, but it's better than Trump's proposed plan to cut corporate taxes by 15%.
The Trump Administration Distorts Birth Control Research
In October 2017, the Trump administration rolled back Obama-era mandates that compelled employers to offer insurance that covered contraception for female employees. In this new formula, if employers feel like they have a religious or moral obligation to have a say over a woman's body, then they can put a stop to their birth control coverage.
In order to pull this kind of garbage, the Trump administration claimed that there's no evidence linking birth control access to lower rates of unintended pregnancies. By saying that “association and causality can be hard to disentangle," they mean that scientists can't prove whether or not giving birth control to women helps curtail unwanted pregnancies.
However, there's no way to actually test causality. Because birth control reduces risk of pregnancy, you can't just go around and test it on women. It would be highly unethical to have a test group where some sexually active women receive birth control while others receive placebos. By trying to prove causality you would be giving these women a human life to take care of.
So, when it comes to history, where does this go off the rails? Oh, you know, the entire history of research concerning the efficacy of birth control gets ignored and obfuscated in misleading scientific jargon.