vote on everything
6.2k voters

Huge Plot Points From 'Lord Of The Rings' That Changed For The Films

Updated 22 Apr 2019 42.3k votes 6.2k voters 293.0k views15 items

List RulesVote up the lost details that deserve to be in the films.

Everyone goes into a film adaptation of a novel expecting some divergence. For the most part, director Peter Jackson was true to Tolkien's beloved tale and expansive universe when he made the Lord of the Rings trilogy. Even so, there were things left out of the Lord of the Rings films, and a few of the lost details are rather massive.

While some devout readers hate the LOTR movies for these changes, a number of the creative choices Jackson and co-writers Fran Walsh and Philippa Boyens made are understandable. But some revisions make the story more convoluted, leaving fans to wonder what went into those decisions. Most people were probably okay without the ever-singing Tom Bombadil, but the final battle at the Shire was more sorely missed. With more than nine hours of screen time, it's amazing how many important details Jackson's LOTR trilogy is missing - and knowing the full story leads to a better appreciation of Tolkien's genius.

PollsFantasyLiteratureAdaptationsThe Lord Of The RingsTotal Nerd