Music

The Most Wildly Inaccurate Biopics Of Famous Musicians And Bands  

Erin McCann
1.4k votes 326 voters 22.7k views 14 items

List Rules Vote up the music biopics that are more fiction than fact.

Condensing the lives of real people into a two-hour movie often forces filmmakers to carefully edit the facts. This sometimes leads to biopics that are more of a fictionalization than an accurate portrayal. People who played a part in the protagonists' lives may be omitted, and events that shaped their beliefs or inspired their actions may be left on the cutting room floor.

These changes don't always make a biopic bad, but they can prevent it from telling the complete truth. The worst offenders change the facts completely or base their plotlines on conspiracy theories and what-ifs. Most often, biographical pictures are inaccurate simply due to the nature of making a movie.

Abridging some pieces of a person's life may be necessary to fit the constraints of a motion picture, but a good biography uses facts in a respectful manner without altering reality. Unfortunately, not every biopic succeeds.

Amadeus is listed (or ranked) 1 on the list The Most Wildly Inaccurate Biopics Of Famous Musicians And Bands
Photo: Orion Pictures

Amadeus won numerous awards, including the 1985 Oscar for Best Picture, but much of the story is pure fiction. Most notably, there is no hard evidence that Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart and Antonio Salieri ever hated one another or engaged in a rivalry. Filmmakers most likely added this to make the story of Mozart more interesting, specifically when viewed through the eyes of a man who wanted him gone.

Though the film shows Salieri (F. Murray Abraham) plotting against Mozart (Tom Hulce) in an attempt to ruin his career, evidence suggests the two men were actually friends. In a letter, Mozart claimed he once gave Salieri a ride to a performance of his opera The Magic Flute, and Salieri thoroughly enjoyed it. It is true that Italian musicians prevented The Marriage of Figaro from being performed in Vienna, and that Salieri beat out Mozart for a position teaching music to the Princess of Württemberg, but there is no evidence that Salieri was behind either of these events, as depicted in the movie.

Amadeus also implies that, in addition to being a notorious womanizer, Mozart became romantic with Caterina Cavalieri, whom he cast in The Abduction from the Seraglio. Salieri is depicted as being more jealous of Mozart for his successful romantic conquest. This love triangle was likely made up by the filmmakers, as history suggests Cavalieri was the mistress of Salieri, and Mozart specifically told his father in a letter that he had no relations with her.

These are the most prominent inaccuracies of Amadeus. Movie fans and historians have also pointed out other departures from reality, such as how conductors operated at the time, the wrong music being played during a dance, and the erroneous depiction of Salieri completing Requiem as Mozart passed.

Is this basically fiction?

More Amadeus

#2 of 205 The Best Movies About Music #197 of 336 'Old' Movies Every Young Person Needs To Watch In Their Lifetimelisted on Every Oscar Winning Film Ever

Lisztomania is listed (or ranked) 2 on the list The Most Wildly Inaccurate Biopics Of Famous Musicians And Bands
Photo: Warner Bros. Pictures

Any viewer who watches Lisztomania to learn about the life of Hungarian composer Franz Liszt is going to be disappointed - and probably very confused.

Instead of delving into Liszt's biography, the film is an absurd fantasy filled with 8-foot-long erections, capes, and vampires. With the Who's Roger Daltrey playing Liszt, and an appearance by Ringo Starr as the Pope, the film says more about art styles in 1975 - the year it was filmed - than the 1800s, when it's supposed to be set.

The film turns Liszt's real-life lover, Princess Carolyne von Sayn-Wittgenstein, into a dominatrix. His son-in-law, composer Richard Wagner, becomes an anti-Semitic vampire who creates a Frankenstein-style monster as a symbol of white supremacy.

Lisztomania certainly succeeds in creating an absurdist spectacle - but maintaining a certain amount of accuracy? Not so much. The Guardian suggests it "may be the most embarrassing historical film ever made."

Is this basically fiction?

More Lisztomania

#11 of 22 The Least Accurate Movies About Historical Figures #113 of 137 The Best Music Movies

Immortal Beloved is listed (or ranked) 3 on the list The Most Wildly Inaccurate Biopics Of Famous Musicians And Bands
Photo: Columbia Pictures

The plot of Immortal Beloved revolves around the discovery that Ludwig van Beethoven left everything to his unnamed "immortal beloved" following his passing in 1827. After discovering this bequest, the composer's executor, Anton Schindler (Jeroen Krabbé), also finds several letters addressed to the mysterious person. In reality, Beethoven's will did not contain anything about an "immortal beloved." The phrase is found in an unsent letter Beethoven wrote in 1812.

Despite this, the movie follows Schindler as he attempts to discover the identity of the unnamed person, and makes the bold assumption that Beethoven had an affair with his sister-in-law Johanna and fathered her son Karl. According to the historical timeline, a romantic relationship between the two would have been impossible, and at least one Beethoven expert believes the "immortal beloved" refers to the wife of a friend.

Immortal Beloved is guilty of more than skewing the facts about Beethoven's personal life. It also exaggerates his deafness, which happened gradually over the course of his life and not as severely as the film suggests.

Is this basically fiction?

More Immortal Beloved

#83 of 304 The Greatest Soundtracks of All Time #473 of 808 The Greatest Chick Flicks Ever Made #21 of 77 The Best Period Romance Movies

4
'Great Balls Of Fire!'
Great Balls of Fire! is listed (or ranked) 4 on the list The Most Wildly Inaccurate Biopics Of Famous Musicians And Bands
Photo: Orion Pictures

Great Balls of Fire! depicts the life of Jerry Lee Lewis (Dennis Quaid), a musician whose career was ruined after he married his 13-year-old cousin. Critics accused the filmmakers of not only painting Lewis in too good a light but also botching the casting.

Quaid was 35 years old when he made the film - or 14 years older than the character he was playing. That only makes it creepier when he begins hitting on 18-year old Winona Ryder, who plays his 12-year-old cousin, Myra Gale Brown. Although probably unintentional, the casting makes Lewis look more like a desperate middle-aged man than a budding rock star.

The filmmakers also changed the details of how the marriage took place. In the film, Lewis presents Gale with a marriage license while driving to a chapel in a state where their marriage will be legal. In real life, Gale claims their marriage was not an impromptu event, and Lewis asked her to marry him a few days before their road trip. While their marriage would have been legal in Mississippi, it was Lewis's third - and he was still technically married to another woman.

The filmmakers were so determined to turn Lewis's decisions into a rose-tinted story that they ended the film with Lewis declaring, "If I'm going to hell, I'm going there playing the piano," followed by a dramatic kiss between the couple and shots of a crowd dancing to his music.

Is this basically fiction?

More Great Balls of Fire!

#128 of 205 The Best Movies About Music #105 of 239 The Best Movies Based on True Stories #13 of 33 The Best Historical Movies Released in the 1980s