Movies have always been given considerable creative liberties when retelling real-life events. When it comes to the most inaccurate war movies, however, there is something sort of unsavory about reshaping such a serious narrative to fit the filmmaker's goals and intentions. After all, to quote General Sherman, "War is Hell." Fiddling with the facts of a real-world war does a great disservice to those who were involved with or in any way impacted by the conflict.
None of this means these films didn't find an audience. Some movies that get war all wrong are astonishingly successful. Many generate hundreds of millions of box office dollars. Others are celebrated Academy Award winners. Others, of course, are just plain failures--critically, commercially, and historically.
Sure, movies are an escape, so why quibble over historical accuracy? Because movies are also an accessible way to inform, educate, and enlighten. Historical accuracy should be a priority in any movie dealing with war. While there are countless films that do make attention to detail a priority, read on to discover several that clearly didn't and vote up for what you think are the least realistic movies about war.
One veteran described Kathryn Bigelow's 2008 Iraq War movie as being "completely made up, with no basis in reality." Despite Bigelow's claims that she wanted the movie to feel as documentary-like as possible, there is very little in The Hurt Locker that measures up to what really happened to the Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) team or how they operated. The movie portrays a tense, 130-minute high-wire act of coursing adrenaline. In reality, those who work in EOD must be logical, measured, and extremely cautious, and they don't barrel into warzones alone. What could have been a jarringly real portrait of the EOD instead got the action movie makeover, with all the typical character tropes and contrived situations action flicks typically entail.
Actors: Evangeline Lilly, Ralph Fiennes, Jeremy Renner, Guy Pearce, David Morse, + more
Initial Release: 2008
Directed by: Kathryn Bigelow
#30 on The Best War Movies Ever
#74 on The Best Movies of the '00s
It is well documented that American military personnel recruited Navajo soldiers to transmit messages in their native language during the Second World War. But what director John Woo does to their heroic effort in Windtalkers is nothing short of butchery. First of all, the movie isn't even really centered on the Native American characters at all; they're supporting players in a story that stars the crazy-eyed, un-Navajo, Nicolas Cage. The movie also implies that non-Native soldiers were supposed to kill any Navajo platoonmates if any of the latter were about to be captured. Yeah…that never happened. Seems like a pretty major plot-point to fudge. The plot also technically hinges on a historical inaccuracy that one critic pointed out:
"The whole imperative of the film -- that we could lose the war if the Navajo is captured -- is basically false, given that Japan was on its knees in late 1944, and Saipan already was won when most of the film's action takes place."
You know. Minor details.
Actors: Nicolas Cage, Mark Ruffalo, Christian Slater, Jason Isaacs, Peter Stormare, + more
Initial Release: 2002
Directed by: John Woo
When the Prime Minister of Great Britain says your movie is historical hogwash, you know you've made a wrong turn. And in the case of the 2000 Jonathan Mostow-directed U-571 that also stars Jon Bon Jovi, there were wrong turns aplenty. U-571 supposedly chronicles the capture of the first Enigma Machine in World War II during a mission known as Operation Primrose. But as many historians have pointed out, at this point in the war the British had already captured multiple Enigmas...months before the war even began. In fact, the British captured all of the Machines and codebooks save for two occasions. But of course, the movie takes the opportunity to shift takes all of the victories and accomplishments of the British soldiers over to the American soldiers. No wonder Tony Blair called it an insult to the British and their pivotal role in the Second World War.
Actors: Matthew McConaughey, Jon Bon Jovi, Bill Paxton, Harvey Keitel, Thomas Kretschmann, + more
Initial Release: 2000
Directed by: Jonathan Mostow
There are many, many people in the world who would consider criticizing Braveheart to be nothing short of sacrilege. But despite all its pomp and circumstance, its pre-crazy Mel Gibson (newsflash: he was always bonkers), its five Oscars, and its cheap sentimentality, Braveheart was a mess from a purely historical perspective. The movie took what could have been a riveting epic of Scottish history and turned it into an action-adventure movie with very little basis in how things actually were or how they actually happened. From blatantly wrong timelines to incorrect clothing to Chinese weapons to a gay king decked out in powder blue and sexually frustrating his queen, Braveheart wasn't particularly brave when it came to facts. Which, come to think of it, is probably something Mel Gibson (who also directed and produced) struggles with, too.
Actors: Mel Gibson, Sophie Marceau, Brendan Gleeson, Brian Cox, Catherine McCormack, + more
Initial Release: 1995
Directed by: Mel Gibson
#9 on The Best War Movies Ever
#55 on The Most Rewatchable Movies