Total Nerd
52 voters

17 Movie Villains Who Are Out For Revenge On The Heroes

June 11, 2021 318 votes 52 voters 2.0k views17 items

List RulesVote up the villains who had pretty good reasons to seek revenge.

A hero is only as good as their villain. Some villains are misguided antiheroes who believe they're doing the right thing, while others are simply greedy or just evil to the core. Some, to paraphrase Alfred when describing the Joker, just want to watch the world burn. But some of the best film villains are those motivated by one simple thing: revenge against the hero. And it makes the story all the more engaging when that revenge is at least a little bit warranted, even if the villains are perhaps taking things a bit too far.

That's the case with these villains, who all want retribution for a wrong that was perpetrated, often by our hero, sometimes by an entire organization or community. And because they have a legitimate beef, a genuine reason to want payback, it makes their dangerous dance with the heroes all the more thrilling.

  • "I've done far worse than kill you. I've hurt you. And I wish to go on hurting you."

    The Villain: When it comes to vengeful villains whose desire for retribution is justified, they don't come much more infamous than Khan Noonien Singh, the antagonist of the second Star Trek movie, where he is played by Ricardo Montalban. According to the film, Khan was a genetically engineered superhuman, possessed of exceptional strength and intellect, who once ruled much of earth in the 1990s (remember that?). Khan and many of his followers were picked up by the Enterprise centuries later, floating in cryogenic stasis. Khan attempted to take over the Enterprise and Captain Kirk marooned Khan and his followers on a deserted but lush planet.

    The Target: Does Captain James T. Kirk (William Shatner) really need an introduction? In the movie he doesn't, though by now he's Admiral Kirk, former captain of the Starship Enterprise

    Why So Vengeful? What Kirk doesn't know at the beginning of the film is that the planet on which Khan and his people were marooned was devastated by the destruction of a nearby world shortly after Kirk left them there. The result was a barren planet, on which Khan and his followers struggled desperately to survive. Many perished, including Khan's wife. Khan blames Kirk's neglect for the suffering of his people and the demise of his wife... more than enough reason for Khan's Ahab to make Kirk his own personal white whale.

    Strong motive?

    More Khan Noonien Singh 

    #184 of 291 The Best TV Villains Of All Time#2 of 15 The Smartest Villains In Sci-Fi Movie History#24 of 472 The Most Interesting Star Trek Characters

  • "You were not content with the stories, so I was obliged to come."

    The Villain: Say his name five times in front of a mirror and he appears behind you, ready to split you from groin to gullet with his hook for a hand. That's Candyman, the vengeful specter played by Tony Todd in Bernard Rose's 1992 adaptation of Clive Barker's short story. By the time the film takes place, Candyman has become an urban legend, "whispered about at street-corners," and he's willing to do whatever it takes not to be forgotten.

    The Target: When it comes to killing, Candyman is largely indiscriminate. If you say his name five times, there he'll be. But the target of his obsession, at least in the first movie, is Helen Lyle (Virginia Madsen), a grad student who calls his existence into doubt, forcing him to appear. The film also heavily implies that Helen may be the reincarnation of Candyman's lover when he was alive... or at least that he thinks she is.

    Why So Vengeful? Slasher films, at least as we came to know them during the height of their 1980s popularity, were the subgenre of retribution. The vast majority of slasher villains - from Jason Voorhees in the Friday the 13th franchise to Ben Willis in I Know What You Did Last Summer  - were wronged in some way that spurred their later sprees. Few had as much cause for righteous vengeance as Daniel Robitaille, however, a Black man whose love affair with a white woman led to his being slain by a mob of angry bigots who cut off his right hand with a rusty blade, covered him with honey, and staked him out to be stung to death by bees. Little wonder that, as Candyman, he's out for a little payback from beyond the grave.

    Strong motive?

    More Candyman 

    #2 of 13 Horror Villains Who Actually Deserve Our Sympathy#9 of 14 14 Evil Movie Villains You Actually Feel Bad For#5 of 15 15 Supposedly Scary Movie Monsters Any Idiot Could Have Easily Defeated

  • "We belong dead."

    The Villain: Monster, creature, Adam Frankenstein, Boris Karloff - whatever you call him, Frankenstein's creation never asked to be made, and when he was, he was rejected by his creator and met with horror, disgust, and violence from just about everyone he encountered. Little wonder, then, that he ran a bit amok.

    The Target: While the "man who made a monster," as the movie's tagline called him, was usually named Victor Frankenstein, as he was in Mary Shelley's 1818 novel, the 1931 film, directed by James Whale, renamed him Henry. Regardless of what he's called, his story is every bit as familiar as that of the being he creates. Frankenstein set out to make a perfect creation, and in the process, his hubris led him to create something he regarded as imperfect. Rather than seeing his achievement as a grand success, he rejected his creation, in the process making it into the monster that he saw it as.

    Why So Vengeful? It's one thing to go after someone because they hurt you, wronged you, were responsible for the demise of a loved one. In the case of Frankenstein's creation, however, his drive for vengeance is more existential. Frankenstein is the cause of his suffering in a much more literal way - had Frankenstein not brought him to life in the first place, then rejected that which he had made, there would be no suffering to begin with.

    Strong motive?

    More Frankenstein's Monster 

    The Best Actors Who Played Frankenstein's Monster#22 of 128 The Most Awesome Monsters & Creatures Of All Time#47 of 60 The Fictional Monsters You'd Least Like to Have After You

  • James D. MacDonald's novel, The Executioners, has been adapted to film twice, both times as Cape Fear. The first was in 1962, starring Robert Mitchum as the film's antagonist, vengeful rapist Max Cady. In Martin Scorsese's Oscar-nominated 1991 remake, that role went to Robert De Niro.

    The Villain: As villains go, Max Cady is about as unredeemable as they come. A vicious serial rapist, he goes to extraordinary lengths to track down and exact vengeance upon the man he blames for sending him to prison.

    The Target: Sam Bowden (played by Gregory Peck in the 1962 original, Nick Nolte in the '91 remake) is a defense attorney with a wife and a teenage daughter. He's also the target of Cady's wrath because Cady blames Bowden for the years he spent behind bars. Of course, the sadistic Cady isn't content merely to eliminate his enemy. He wants to toy with him, stalk him, torment him, and target his family.

    Why So Vengeful? In both versions of Cape Fear, Max Cady blames Sam Bowden for sending him to prison. In the '62 version, it's because Bowden testified against him after catching him in the act. In the 1991 version, however, Cady's anger is more justified, even if the rest of his actions are not. This version paints Bowden as Cady's defense attorney who intentionally suppressed evidence that might have helped get his client a lighter sentence because he was so disgusted by Cady's actions and because Cady had bragged about beating previous charges.

    Strong motive?

    More Max Cady 

    #192 of 877 The Greatest Movie Villains Of All Time#824 of 3,517 The Best Movie Characters Of All Time#10 of 16 16 Movie Villains With Absolutely No Chill