Notorious Mega-Flops That Actually Made Way More Money Than You Think  

Nathan Gibson
673 votes 183 voters 11.9k views 15 items

List Rules Vote up the films you're most surprised weren't huge bombs.

In the world of modern cinema, studios make huge losses on films that doesn't live up to expectations. When budgets reach sums totaling hundreds of millions of dollars, with marketing campaigns that are equally as expensive, a disappointing release can prove incredibly costly. The unfortunate news for executives is, this happens all too often. Not every movie can be a hit, and there are dozens of massive box office bombs released every year.

However, not all notorious mega-flops lose money; more often than you might think, films regarded as disasters by the press narrative are victim to a misconstrued truth that gives rise to bizarre alternate reality rife with profitable movies regarded as flops. Peter Jackson's King Kong, which you may not even think of as a flop, is one such film, as press quotes from the time of the film's release will show. 

When worldwide box office receipts or DVD and blu-ray sales are taken into account, films regarded as flops are suddenly successful. Because of this, certain movies everyone believes were failures actually proved profitable for the studios behind them, though it some cases it took years for this to happen. Take a look at some of these flops that didn't flop and see if you thought they lost millions at the cinema.

Superman Returns is listed (or ranked) 1 on the list Notorious Mega-Flops That Actually Made Way More Money Than You Think
Photo:  Warner Bros.

Superman Returns is widely accepted as an artistic failure and often referred to as a bomb. It had a gigantic budget of around $270 million, plus around $100 million in marketing costs, bringing the total outlay for Warner Bros. to an estimated $363 million. On that budget, it made $391,081,192. Despite barely making back production costs before tallying movie theater take, Alan Horn confirmed, in August 2006, the studio viewed the movie as a success (his wording is a bit tricky, and he doesn't seem to assert the movie was a financial success).  

Yet Superman Returns posted huge DVD sales, earning  $85,730,989 in the United States and Canada alone. These figures don't take into account blu-ray sales or worldwide numbers from either home video sales or sales of foreign home release licensing. 

Agree or disagree?

More Superman Returns

#211 of 304 The Greatest Soundtracks of All Time #20 of 102 The Worst Superhero Movies Ever Made #79 of 183 The Best Superhero Movies Ever Made

Waterworld is listed (or ranked) 2 on the list Notorious Mega-Flops That Actually Made Way More Money Than You Think
Photo:  Universal Pictures

Waterworld, released in 1995, is one of the most famous flops in movie history. Made on a massive budget of $172 million, which spiraled thanks to production problems and a hurricane that destroyed a large set, it received mix reviews from critics and audiences. Factoring in marketing, the total expenditure for the film was around $235 million. While it is true Waterworld failed to recoup its costs at the box office, a successful home release and other sales meant it made an estimated profit of $67 million.

As of 2015, Waterworld routinely makes lists of the biggest box office bombs of all time, despite the numbers showing a different narrative. If nothing else, you can take solace in the fact that one reviewer on Amazon described the movie as "like Mad Max, but wetter."

Agree or disagree?

More Waterworld

#90 of 157 The Best Science Fiction Action Movies #644 of 1,699 The Most Rewatchable Moviesfeaturing Not Only Was 'Waterworld' A Complete Flop, It Was An Utter Disaster During Production

Planet of the Apes is listed (or ranked) 3 on the list Notorious Mega-Flops That Actually Made Way More Money Than You Think
Photo:  20th Century Fox

Tim Burton's 2001 Planet of the Apes could never match the success of the original. Having been in development for years before it was finally released (and attached to such names as Oliver Stone and James Cameron, before Burton signed on), the remake received mixed reviews for the bizarre twist ending, and criticism for its cast choices.

Still, Planet of the Apes brought in more than $360 million in total box office receipts against a budget of $100 million. This modest financial success wasn't enough to convince Fox to greenlight a sequel, though. Fans waited until 2011 for a new entry in the franchise. A piece on box office failures from Den of Geek points out that, adjusted for inflation, the 2001 Planet of the Apes made almost as much as the 2011 reboot, and the former was considered a flop, while the later was hailed as a major success. 

Agree or disagree?

More Planet of the Apes

#67 of 347 The Best Movies Based On Books #83 of 157 The Best Science Fiction Action Movies #287 of 582 The Greatest Film Scores of All Time

Terminator Genisys is listed (or ranked) 4 on the list Notorious Mega-Flops That Actually Made Way More Money Than You Think
Photo:  Paramount Pictures

The release of Terminator: Genisys in 2015 led to sneers from almost everyone, including longtime fans of the franchise. Flickering Myth went so far as to wonder whether it's the worst tentpole ever made. With an incredibly complicated plot that was almost impossible to follow and baffling casting choices, it was a failure in the US, grossing just $89,760,956 domestically. This led to the movie being stuck with the label of failure, despite its strong showing internationally.

Genisys earned $113,175,898 in China, and $350,842,581 in total overseas box office. As Forbes points out, it made more than two-and-a-half times its production budget, a general mark for profitability. It's total worldwide gross was $440,603,537, against a production budget of $155 million, and it earned at least $25,690,974 in domestic DVD and blu-ray sales, which numbers don't take into account fees from streaming services or digital sales and rentals. 

Agree or disagree?