In the hunt for physical evidence of Noah's Ark and proof that Moses parted the Red Sea, scholars have shown that science can support Biblical stories. But what about proof of Jesus? Is there physical evidence that Jesus, the alleged son of God and savior of mankind, was a real person?
Scholars and Christians have debated the reality of Jesus for centuries, searching for proof that Jesus walked the earth two thousand years ago. Some argue that Jesus is a myth, or an invention, rather than a real person. From images, to texts, to archaeological evidence and other physical proof, there is a great deal of evidence that Jesus was real. However, some of this evidence is problematic. At the end of the day, what does the physical evidence show?
The 1968 discovery of crucifixion evidence shows that it is possible to find physical proof of Jesus's existence. In the search for proof of Jesus in history, there are hundreds of physical objects in Christian churches that have been linked to Christ, from fragments of the cross to the crown of thorns. Many medieval churches even claimed to have found the circumcised foreskin of Jesus. But is this evidence reliable?
Skeptics point to the changing stories about Jesus in the last 2,000 years, including the shocking history of how Jesus became white. They dismissively claim that the only proof that Jesus is real comes from his own followers, who could have invented the story. But is there evidence of Jesus outside the Bible? It turns out that the answer is definitely yes.
The Shroud Of Turin May Have Been Used To Wrap Jesus' Crucified Body
When it comes to physical evidence of Jesus, the most famous might be the Shroud of Turin. The 14-foot long cloth shows clear evidence of being used as a burial wrap, used by someone with a number of bloody wounds. The shroud first appeared in the 1300s, and since that time scholars have debated whether it is a forgery.
The mystery surrounding the Shroud of Turin only deepened when it was first photographed, revealing a detailed image of a bearded man when viewed in the reverse negative. A research project concluded in 1981 that the image was an actual human, and the blood on the shroud was real, not the product of an artist.
However, radiocarbon dating of the Shroud of Turin shows that the cloth dates to the fourteenth century, exactly when it was first identified. As a result, most scholars do not consider the Shroud of Turn reliable evidence of the existence of Jesus.
These Nails May Have Been Used To Crucify JesusVideo: YouTube
The April 2011 discovery of two nails, possibly used for a crucifixion, may provide physical proof that Jesus not only lived, but died at the hands of the Romans. The two nails were discovered in a 2,000-year-old tomb in Jerusalem, and there is some evidence that they were linked to the crucifixion of Jesus.
However, the majority of experts and scholars doubt the nails can be tied to Jesus. In 1911, scholar Herbert Thurston proved that there were at least 30 "holy nails" being venerated across Europe, when the true number was likely three or four. As a result, the nails are only circumstantial evidence.
The Pilate Stone Proves That Pontius Pilate Was Real
Before 1961, there was no physical evidence that Pontius Pilate, the governor of Judea who ordered the crucifixion of Jesus, was real. He was mentioned in multiple texts, but his administrative records, letters to Rome, and even his aqueduct, did not survive... until the discovery of the so-called Pilate stone.
The Pilate stone was excavated at Caesarea Maritima, a seaport built by Herod the Great. The stone bears the name of Pontius Pilate, making it the only archaeological evidence that Pilate existed. The inscription reads, “Pontius Pilate, prefect of Judaea, has made this Tiberieum and dedicated it to the Augustan gods.” The Pilate stone helps establish the existence of an important person mentioned in the Gospels, making it more likely that Jesus was a real person.
Archaeological Evidence Shows That Nazareth Existed In The Time Of Jesus
Today, the city of Nazareth is a real place in Israel. But did Nazareth actually exist in the era of Jesus? Some authors have argued that the entire city was a Christian invention. However, in 2009 the Israeli Antiquities Authority uncovered archaeological proof that Nazareth did exist in the first century CE.
Archaeologists uncovered remains of houses that dated back to the time of Jesus. The houses were small, private dwellings, and no public buildings have been identified. The researchers have found evidence of vineyards, terrace farming, stonemasonry, and olive presses. The physical evidence has ended debates over whether Nazareth existed - but they cannot prove that Jesus was real. As for the stone rolled in front of a tomb in Nazareth, that is a modern addition.