8 Facts About Prehistoric Sex That Show The Ways We Have - And Haven't - Evolved

What was caveman sex like? How can we even know? Researchers have employed several methods to make educated guesses about the bedroom lives of prehistoric folk, including examining closely related primates, studying what human evolution has wrought, and finding clues in the existing fossil records of early man. From these examinations, a rough picture of primitive sexuality emerges... and it's more than just skimpy loincloths and aggression.

There's also prehistoric art, which, much like art in the 21st century, reveals a lot about the culture that made it. Examining all of these factors reveals that caveman lovemaking was probably a lot more similar to that of modern times than you might imagine. Early hunting-and-gathering Homo sapiens probably engaged in bestiality and inbreeding a bit more than modern people do (hopefully!), and some experts think they weren't as keen on monogamy, but on the whole, their love lives weren't totally alien. Read on for some fascinating prehistoric facts.

  • Experts Believe Prehistoric Women Were "Extraordinarily Promiscuous"

    In an interview with Salon, historians Christopher Ryan and Cacilda Jethá argued that agriculture “introduced the notion of property into sexuality,” causing men to start to worry about leaving land and domesticated animals to their biological children. Prior to that, relationships for prehistoric men and women was basically a free-for-all, since paternity wasn’t a significant concern.

    Women in particular were “hard-wired to behave like chimps in the bedroom,” to quote Daniel Honan at Big Think. Experts cite women's ability to have "multiples" as proof that pre-agricultural cavewomen were  “extraordinarily promiscuous” and had multiple partners in order to up their chances of reproducing. Partners in small groups of foraging cavefolk were shared, just like food, shelter, and other essential needs.

    The image of club-wielding prehistoric men dragging a woman to their cave is probably not as common as pop culture would indicate. Instead, cavemen were more likely forced to wait for their turn.

  • Prehistoric People Probably Engaged In Bestiality

    Anthony L. Podberscek and Andrea M Beetz’s Bestiality and Zoophilia: Sexual Relations with Animals cites about a half-dozen studies chronicling examples in prehistoric art, including one from 1968 that concludes there’s “no doubt that our prehistoric ancestors enjoyed frequent and pleasurable... relations with animals.”

    A 25,000-year-old “engraved bone rod” found in a cave in France, for example, depicts “a lioness licking the opening of..." human genitalia. An Iron Age cave painting in Italy “portrays a man inserting his [member] into... a donkey.” Experts believe that some of these explicit drawings even had a key connection to some prehistoric clans' familial lineage.

  • Prehistoric Statues May Have Been Caveman "Entertainment"

    Historians debate about whether the so-called “Venus statuettes” carved by prehistoric man were meant as "adult entertainment" or were used for spiritual purposes. The former contingent – represented by historian Rudolf Feustel – think the busty statues were an expression of “raw animal lust.”

    Team Spirituality, including Jill Cook of the British Museum in London, believes the objects had nothing to do with lust but were instead used as fertility idols for a culture that worshiped pregnancy. Cook says men in the Gravettian culture of 30,000 years ago, for example, "did not comprehend [its] biological function" and thus thought pregnancy was a miraculous act to be revered. Some of the statuettes even feature exposed genitalia and bulging bellies.

  • Cavemen Carved Dual-Purpose "Toys"

    Even as far back as 30,000 years ago, people were making "toys for adults." Yes, we can’t say for sure that these lovingly-carved phallic objects – which were polished smooth and “notched” to resemble the look and textture – were used for pleasuring oneself, but as archaeologist Timothy Taylor says, considering the “size, shape, and – in some cases – explicit symbolism of the Ice Age batons, it seems disingenuous to avoid the most obvious and straightforward interpretation.”

    The phallus pictured above was discovered in the Hohle Fels Cave in southwestern Germany and dates back 29,000 years. Unlike most modern ones, it was multi-functional, since the wear indicates it may have also been used as a crude hammer.

  • Homo Sapiens Totally Did It With Neanderthals

    Modern humans - AKA homo sapiens - totally bumped uglies with Neanderthals (as well as other subspecies) in prehistoric times. Nature reported in 2011 that “an analysis comparing the Neanderthal genome sequence to that of modern H. sapiens showed that some interbreeding did take place between the two species in Europe sometime between 80,000 and 30,000 years ago.” This means “to a certain extent, Neanderthals 'live on' in the genes of modern humans.”

    Human-Neanderthal hybrid babies were a thing, but they were rare: one study suggests that only female homo sapiens were capable of producing fertile offspring after mating with male Neanderthals and not the other way around.

  • There Was A Significant Amount Of Inbreeding

    There Was A Significant Amount Of Inbreeding
    Video: YouTube

    In 2013, findings published in PLOS ONE revealed that our prehistoric ancestors likely engaged in “high levels of inbreeding,” which was “inevitable” due to the isolated nature of early cavemen clans. Researchers discovered that a specific, fractured 100,000-year-old Homo sapiens skull – when joined together using CT scanning and 3D modeling – had an “unusual genetic mutation” that was probably caused by generations of inbreeding. The mutation caused a hole in the crown of the skull, a defect known as “an enlarged parietal foramen.”

    The owner of this particular skull, despite the mutation, likely lived into their 30s.