Total Nerd

The Rise And Fall Of Spike TV  

Joesph Langdon
352.3k views 14 items

The rise and fall of Spike TV is a tragic tale. Now rebranded as the Paramount Network, Spike had a 15-year run that produced some pretty great programming, but that wasn't enough to stop the channel from going the way of G4.

Spike TV's downfall can be attributed to its niche branding and public image. Executives wanted you to know that they ran a network that was very male-dominated. While this was well-received in 2003, the pitch isn't exactly attractive in an era when masculinity is often viewed as regressive. It doesn't help that, in its later years, the network was forced to directly compete with more modern channels like Viceland. At the start, Spike TV was touted as "the first network for men" by founder Albie Hecht. Given what happened to Spike TV in the decade and a half that followed, it's safe to assume that the channel can also be referred to as the last of its kind. 

Spike TV's Brand Manifesto Was A Challenge
Spike TV's Brand Manifesto Was... is listed (or ranked) 1 on the list The Rise And Fall Of Spike TV
Photo: Viacom, Inc/Wikimedia Commons/Public Domain

Spike TV tried to clarify its brand vision with a manifesto in 2006. This manifesto included some choice quotes like, "Spike isn't here to preach, or to tell you how to live your lives (that's what wives and girlfriends are for!)." Additionally, Spike TV dedicated itself to an "eternal bachelor" image, and celebrated an unwillingness to compromise or consider the needs of others.

The document went so far as to pair phrases like "Spike is unapologetically male" with an image of a man snapping a pic of an unaware sunbather. 

Spike Lee Sued The Network, Alleging That They Were Trying To Capitalize On His Name
Spike Lee Sued The Network, Al... is listed (or ranked) 2 on the list The Rise And Fall Of Spike TV
Photo: Nightscream/Wikimedia Commons/CC BY 3.0

Even before Spike TV officially launched in August 2003, the channel was embroiled in controversy. In June of that year, filmmaker Spike Lee sued the network for allegedly capitalizing on his image. According to Lee, the network's name implied that he was in some way affiliated with them. After a sizable settlement, the filmmaker changed his perspective, and claimed that he didn't think Spike TV was purposefully attempting to profit off his name. The settlement worked out well for both parties, as Lee signed up to work on future projects for MTV Networks in the process.

Even so, the lawsuit delayed the official launch of the channel by eight weeks, as it was originally scheduled to premiere in mid-June. This delay cost the network millions of dollars in lost revenue and rebranding expenses. Luckily, the very public legal battle offered quite a bit of publicity for both parties. 

Spike Was Advertised As 'The First Network For Men'
Spike Was Advertised As 'The F... is listed (or ranked) 3 on the list The Rise And Fall Of Spike TV
Photo: Pixabay/Public Domain

When Spike TV launched in 2003, its primary target demographic was males aged 18 to 34, who apparently watched less television than any other group. The channel dug an even deeper niche by advertising to a specific subsection of viewers who felt that their masculinity was being threatened by other channels' programming. 

While Spike acknowledged that Comedy Central, The History Channel, and ESPN all produced shows that its viewers could enjoy, these channels were not explicitly marketed the way Spike was. The year the network launched, Albie Hecht, the channel's founder, claimed that "there is no one place that guys can come for a home base."

Executives Were Shocked To Learn That The Public Considered Spike TV Lowbrow
Executives Were Shocked To Lea... is listed (or ranked) 4 on the list The Rise And Fall Of Spike TV
Photo: Ed Webster/Wikimedia Commons/CC BY 2.0

Spike TV set out to make quality content for men. Apparently, that meant MMA fights and racy animated shows like Stripperella. In 2005, network executives decided to conduct a survey to see how the public perceived Spike, and they were shocked to find out that most people considered their programming to be lowbrow.

"What we actually found out, which was really eye-opening for us, was that they didn’t perceive us the way we perceived us," Spike TV president Kevin Kay said of the survey. Even after Spike tried to reinvent their brand to appear more generally edgy, the channel found that their reputation was cemented in the public consciousness. Most focus group participants didn't watch Spike TV, and formed their perception of the network via word of mouth.