Underrated Horror Sequels That Are Way Better Than You've Heard 

Skyler Hanrath
Updated July 10, 2018 1.6k votes 390 voters 9.5k views 13 items

List Rules Vote up the disturbing sequels that scared you more than the original films.

From tales of masked, knife-wielding men to gory accounts of water-averse monsters with dietary restrictions, horror is one of film's most versatile genres. While scares come in all shapes and sizes, horror fans seem reluctant to engage with sequels that retread nightmares from years past. 

Die-hard fans will always show up for a new Michael Myers outing or the return of Jigsaw, but horror sequels rarely draw the same crowds enjoyed by never-before-seen monstrosities. 

Despite what you may have heard, not every horror followup misses the mark established by its predecessor. Many diverge from established narrative arcs to dig deeply into the grotesque possibilities of their universes. Some of the best horror movies are also sequels, and a few prove to be scarier than the originals. 

Split is listed (or ranked) 1 on the list Underrated Horror Sequels That Are Way Better Than You've Heard
Photo:  Universal Pictures

Despite M. Night Shyamalan's misfires, 2016's Split surprised audiences by proving the guy who made The Sixth Sense still has the capacity to produce a restrained horror film. 

The story follows Kevin Crumb (James MacAvoy), a loner whose dissociative identity disorder manifests in the form of 23 distinct personalities. After one of Kevin's more violent identities kidnaps three young women, the protagonist begins an internal battle over the treatment of his prisoners. 

A modest budget – it was reportedly made for $9 million – helped limit the film's scope, and Shyamalan’s penchant for final-act twists pays off big time, especially if you're familiar with his early work. 

Is this film horrifying?

More Split 

#148 of 184 The Best Superhero Movies Ever Made #3 of 75 The Best Blumhouse Productions Movies

28 Weeks Later is listed (or ranked) 2 on the list Underrated Horror Sequels That Are Way Better Than You've Heard
Photo:  20th Century Fox

Whereas 28 Days Later examined the fall of London in the wake of a viral outbreak, 28 Weeks Later picks up months after the virus has been contained. As NATO attempts to return the country to a state of normality, a second outbreak occurs, leading to some unbelievable moments that make the original film seem tame. 

While the film failed to surpass its predecessor’s box office take, it more than delivers as a smart followup. Once you've seen a hoard of zombies get mowed down by the blades of a moving helicopter, it's hard to be scared of slow, old-school zombies. 

Is this film horrifying?

More 28 Weeks Later 

#80 of 799 The Best Horror Movies Of All Time #64 of 180 The Best Movie Sequels Ever Made

10 Cloverfield Lane is listed (or ranked) 3 on the list Underrated Horror Sequels That Are Way Better Than You've Heard
Photo:  Paramount Pictures

The Cloverfield franchise launched in 2008, and has since spawned two followups. All three entries enjoyed guerilla marketing campaigns – the straight-to-Netflix film The Cloverfield Paradox released after a single ad announced its existence at the 2018 Super Bowl - which definitely has pros and cons. 

While the approach yields tremendous buzz, most people don't think about old advertisements once a film is released, so the movies have a hard time sticking in the cultural consciousness. 

Despite the franchise's ephemeral status, 10 Cloverfield Lane is anything but forgettable. The film started off as an original property titled Valenciabut adapted Cloverfield's signature aesthetic (shaky, handheld camera, enormous reptilian monsters) to benefit from name recognition.

John Goodman plays the alternately violent and caring Howard Stambler, a doomsday-prepper who brings Michelle and Emmett into his subterranean bunker to protect them from a supposed nuclear fallout. What follows is a thriller that evokes the containment horror of Panic Room or Saw

Is this film horrifying?

More 10 Cloverfield Lane 

#468 of 799 The Best Horror Movies Of All Time #10 of 177 The Very Best Movies of 2016, Ranked All The 'Cloverfield' Easter Eggs You Definitely Missed

Blade II is listed (or ranked) 4 on the list Underrated Horror Sequels That Are Way Better Than You've Heard
Photo:  New Line Cinema

Oscar-winning director Guillermo del Toro is known for his visual style,  and his sequel to the Marvel-inspired vampire-hunter film Blade boasts some of his most visceral imagery.

Blade (Wesley Snipes) is a righteous human-vampire hybrid who's sworn to protect the blood of the living. Blade II takes place two years after the first film wraps, and finds Blade in an uneasy alliance with his vampiric enemies. While they don't see eye to eye, they've found a mutually threatening foe: a mutated line of vampires known as Reapers who are intent on killing everyone, regardless of species. 

Del Toro’s affinity for imaginative character design really pays off, as the Reapers' faces resemble blooming flowers with pitbull fangs. At the box office, the film was the highest grossing installment of the Blade franchise, and cleared its production budget by a considerable margin. 

Is this film horrifying?

More Blade II 

#1,108 of 1,699 The Most Rewatchable Movies #215 of 799 The Best Horror Movies Of All Time #57 of 165 The Greatest Comic Book Movies of All Time