Weird Nature Rare Animals That Look Fake But Are In Fact 100% Real  

Eric Vega
18.4k votes 1.9k voters 51.2k views 22 items Embed

List Rules Vote up the animals you think look totally fake, but are shockingly not.

The Internet is full of clever and deceptive images that confuse people to the point where they can no longer can tell what is real and what is fake. This fact extends to pictures of crazy animals that are so weird-looking, it's hard to believe they actually exist. It can be difficult to trust your own senses when everything about these images sets off alarms in your mind of being false. That's why everyone needs a trusty guide to help sort out truth from fiction.

Every single one of these strange-looking animals is 100% real. Like photos of albino animals, these pictures of bizarre creatures are genuine and have not been doctored or photoshopped. Nature is strange and nothing makes that more clear than these photos that look like something out of a Dr. Seuss book on crack. Check out all these freaks of nature that will have even the most gullible readers second-guessing what their eyes are seeing. Vote up the unique animals you seriously can't believe are actually real. 

1 1,242 VOTES

Glaucus Atlanticus


Glaucus atlanticus is listed (or ranked) 1 on the list Rare Animals That Look Fake But Are In Fact 100% Real
Photo:  Imtorn/Wikimedia Commons

Scientific Name: Glaucus atlanticus

977 265
Does this look fake?
2 1,117 VOTES

Chinese Water Deer


Water Deer is listed (or ranked) 2 on the list Rare Animals That Look Fake But Are In Fact 100% Real
Photo:  Momotarou2012/Wikimedia Commons

Scientific Name: Hydropotes inermis

793 324
Does this look fake?
3 1,094 VOTES

Pacu


Pacu is listed (or ranked) 3 on the list Rare Animals That Look Fake But Are In Fact 100% Real
Photo:  Nisamanee wanmoon/Wikimedia Commons
682 412
Does this look fake?
4 899 VOTES

Hag Moth Caterpillar


Hag Moth Caterpillar is listed (or ranked) 4 on the list Rare Animals That Look Fake But Are In Fact 100% Real
Photo: Greg Dwyer/Wikimedia Commons
569 330
Does this look fake?