List of horribly-named Rock Supergroups. Why this trend? Do they not have access to a thesaurus? Is it because the bandmembers don't have shared-life experiences and can't agree on anything cool? Do they all just completely lack a shred of a clue living in their "rock star bubbles"? Is it because, already being rich and famous, all the bandmembers decide they can afford to waste precious branding on some inside joke (probably resulting from some coke-addled bonding session)? Do their multiple managers just throw their arms in the air and give up? It can't be a complete lack of creativity - some of these groups can still write great songs.
Who knows. The evidence is clear - Rock Supergroups have a surprisingly high instance of crap names. Vote up if you think the name is crap, to rank them from worst to just-sorta bad. Another cop-out for Supergroups is to just name them by combining band names - we will leave out bandnames like Crosby, Stills, Nash, and Young or West, Bruce, and Laing since it's hard to rank them as any worse than the next one, though I don't condone this naming-convention either.Examples of decent-to-good supergroup names, for the record: Blind Faith, Cream, The Raconteurs