Total Nerd 15 Reasons Why Parks And Rec Has Always Been Better Than The Office  

Collin Flatt
46.3k votes 6.9k voters 147k views 15 items

List Rules Vote up the reasons why Pawnee outclasses Scranton.

There are so many reasons why Parks and Recreation is better than The Office. Sure, you might think this is getting into apples and oranges territory; they're entirely different shows with self-contained universes. But both are filmed mockumentary style, both come from Greg Daniels and Michael Schur, and both courted the same comedy geek audience. People love to argue about which of the two is the best NBC sitcom. But the answer is obvious: it's Parks and Recreation

Leslie, Ron, Ben, Chris, April, Andy, Tom, Donna, and Jerry/Larry/Garry/Terry are better than Michael, Dwight, Jim, Pam, Kelly, Angela, Stanley, Phyllis, and Ryan. The day-to-day insanity of Parks was much funnier than the awkwardness of The Office. These are just a few of the reasons why Parks and Rec is the best, and there's plenty more here to prove the point. So, if you're a true believer in the power of Pawnee, IN, study up on these facts so you can smoke a Dunder Mifflin-ite in a Parks and Rec vs. The Office showdown.

1 4,559 VOTES

Two Words: Ron Swanson

Ranker Video
Video: YouTube

One character can't make an entire series, but Nick Offerman's performance as the stern, yet loveable Ron Swanson makes a pretty strong case. The intensely-mustachioed department director could have easily become a one-note man's man but the writing staff turned him into a complicated and complete character and Offerman hit every note perfectly.

Ron is wise and cranky, kind and fair, easily triggered, and has complicated relationships with women named Tammy. He hates Canada. He hates Europe. He leads a double life as sexy jazz saxophonist Duke Silver in the next town over. He uses the Internet to get the addresses of people and places he hates, and then writes them strongly worded letters from his typewriter. Oh, and he marries Xena herself, Lucy Lawless, late in the series.

3,750 809
Is this a good reason?
2 4,381 VOTES

Ann Is Way Better Than Karen

Ann Is Way Better Than Karen is listed (or ranked) 2 on the list 15 Reasons Why Parks And Rec Has Always Been Better Than The Office
Photo:  NBC

Karen was just awful on The Office. It wasn't Rashida Jones's fault – she was saddled with a character whose whole presence on the show was to be "not Pam." She was basically a pretty person in business clothes, and viewers knew she was never going to end up with Jim. 

On Parks, though, Jones started out as an angry citizen at a zoning meeting and the caretaker of Andy Dwyer. She quickly became best friends with Leslie, and their relationship defined a central part of the whole Parks experience. She had a hilarious love/hate feud with April, and had plenty of great scenes with almost everyone in the cast. Some of her narrative twists and turns made no sense at all (dating Tom?), but she ended up standing out as a strong character on a show with a whole lot of strong characters.

3,391 990
Is this a good reason?
3 4,022 VOTES

Parks's Cast Was Unbelievably Great

Parks's Cast Was Unbelieva... is listed (or ranked) 3 on the list 15 Reasons Why Parks And Rec Has Always Been Better Than The Office
Photo:  NBC

Steve Carell (Michael Scott) got plenty of attention when Anchorman came out, but The Office really cemented his star status. John Krasinski (Jim Halpert) has become a Hollywood leading man. But the rest of the cast hasn't really shown up too often since Dunder Mifflin closed up shop.

Parks and Recreation introduced viewers to Chris Pratt (now one of Hollywood's most bankable stars), Aziz Ansari (now one of the biggest comedians in the business and a showrunner, to boot), and Aubrey Plaza (currently starring on FX's Legion). Adam Scott (Big Little Lies) hit his stride on the show, and Rob Lowe basically restarted his career. That's not to mention how the show finally found a fun character for Rashida Jones, who was underutilized on The Office.

3,041 981
Is this a good reason?
4 3,415 VOTES

Parks Had More Meaningful Character Development In A Shorter Amount Of Time

Parks Had More Meaningful Char... is listed (or ranked) 4 on the list 15 Reasons Why Parks And Rec Has Always Been Better Than The Office
Photo:  NBC

Michael Scott didn't grow throughout his time on The Office. He was a selfish, awkward, and often sweet dummy from the pilot until he left Dunder Mifflin with a new bride-to-be. Jim, Pam, and Dwight grew plenty, but they also had significantly more screen time than the rest of their co-stars. Many of the supporting cast were one-note jokes at best (looking at you, Kevin), and most of them contributed little or nothing to The Office legacy.

The success of Parks and Recreation relied heavily on the growth of their characters, and so many of them went through significant career and personal evolution over seven seasons compared to The Office's nine. Leslie, Ann, Ben, Ron, Tom, Chris, April, Andy, Donna, and, yes, even Jerry/Larry/Garry/Terry were not the same people at the end of their Parks run that they were at the start.

2,578 837
Is this a good reason?