Today's movie audiences love to complain that Hollywood films are nothing but reboots. As conventional wisdom goes, movie studios rely so much on reboots because, unlike an original property, a reboot is based on a proven success.
But the truth is, reboots can be just as risky to make as a completely new film. A reboot has to both be faithful to the original movie while also giving audiences something new. If it's too similar, it'll be called unoriginal; if it's too new, it'll be accused of ruining people's childhoods. It's a balancing act that many remakes fail to pull off, though when they do it's memorable. Reboots face another challenge that original movies don't: they're often made in a completely different time period. A movie made in 1982 was meant for an audience with completely different tastes and values than an audience in 2019. Finally, because of the realities of the movie industry, reboots can suffer from the same problems that affected the original films - everything from behind-the-scenes creative struggles to bad casting to questionable marketing strategies.
Here are some of the worst movie reboots of the 2010s that prove it's a lot harder to pull off a reboot than it looks.
When fans complain about the overabundance of reboots, particularly superhero reboots, the 2015 Fantastic Four is one of their prime examples. As Variety pointed out at the time, this version of Fantastic Four came out only eight years after the previous one. Since the original Fantastic Four movies weren't themselves huge hits, the producers probably should have waited longer to try again. That Fox was forced to rush production in order to retain the film rights to the characters didn't help either.
On top of that, Fantastic Four experienced behind-the-scenes creative struggles that can happen on any film set. On the eve of the premier, director Josh Trank disavowed his own movie via a tweet that he later deleted.
But hey, if you were disappointed by the 2015 reboot, here's some good news: at Comic-Con International this year, Marvel announced that the reboot is getting a reboot. Maybe this time it'll all work out.
Rotten Tomatoes score: 9%
Like many of the other reboots on this list, The Transporter Refueled had the unenviable task of recapturing the success of the original without its original star, Jason Statham. But it wasn't just that Jason Statham's performance in the 2002 Transporter was memorable; it was the breakout role that made him a star. The 2002 version proved that Statham could lead a movie. His replacement, Ed Skrein, who had previously appeared on Game of Thrones Season 3 as Daario Naharis, just wasn't up to the task.
The remake would eventually earn back three times its budget, but it still had one of the worst opening weekends in movie history.
Rotten Tomatoes Score: 16%
For certain fans, the 2016 Ghostbusters reboot was an exciting prospect. It was led by women, starred four comedy powerhouses (Melissa McCarthy, Kate McKinnon, Kristin Wiig, and Leslie Jones), and helmed by a veteran comedy director (Paul Feig), all working together to reboot one of the greatest comedies of all time. Unfortunately, for other fans, those same reasons were grounds to hate it.
Before Ghostbusters was even released in theaters, it received so much backlash that any hype the film might have had was ruined. These fans weren't just angry that someone was "ruining their childhood"; they actively tried to tank the movie's prospects, spamming the movie's IMDB page with 1/10 scores, making its YouTube trailer the most disliked in history, and viciously going after cast members on social media.
The movie would end up underperforming globally by at least $70 million, and we'll never know if it would have succeeded without so much internet hate. However, after the dust had settled, star of the original films Dan Aykroyd placed the blame entirely on Feig. According to Akyroyd, Feig refused suggestions that would have improved the script and overspent on reshoots.
Rotten Tomatoes Score: 74%
Universal had high expectations for its 2017 Mummy reboot. It was based on an established property and it starred one of Hollywood's most reliable leading men in Tom Cruise. Universal had hoped that The Mummy would kick off a new Dark Universe series of films based on its classic horror properties, like Frankenstein and the Invisible Man. It did end up being Tom Cruise's biggest global opening ever, but still lost an estimated $95 million.
The biggest problem was most likely audience confusion. When fans heard "Mummy reboot," they were expecting to revisit the beloved Brendan Fraser trilogy of the late '90s. Instead, the Tom Cruise version was based entirely on the 1932 Boris Karloff version. And unlike both the Fraser and Karloff versions, which were set in the 1920s, the Cruise version was set in present day.
There were numerous other issues, from the dwindling influence of star power to having to compete with the smash-hit Wonder Woman. But in the end, The Mummy just didn't have a lot in common with any of its predecessors.
Rotten Tomatoes score: 16%