16.7k voters

The Worst Movie Reboots Of The 2010s Decade

Updated July 20, 2020 149.5k votes 16.7k voters 383.6k views20 items

List RulesVote up the cinematic reboots that failed to live up to the films and franchises that inspired them.

Today's movie audiences love to complain that Hollywood films are nothing but reboots. As conventional wisdom goes, movie studios rely so much on reboots because, unlike an original property, a reboot is based on a proven success. 

But the truth is, reboots can be just as risky to make as a completely new film. A reboot has to both be faithful to the original movie while also giving audiences something new. If it's too similar, it'll be called unoriginal; if it's too new, it'll be accused of ruining people's childhoods. It's a balancing act that many remakes fail to pull off, though when they do it's memorable. Reboots face another challenge that original movies don't: they're often made in a completely different time period. A movie made in 1982 was meant for an audience with completely different tastes and values than an audience in 2019. Finally, because of the realities of the movie industry, reboots can suffer from the same problems that affected the original films - everything from behind-the-scenes creative struggles to bad casting to questionable marketing strategies.  

Here are some of the worst movie reboots of the 2010s that prove it's a lot harder to pull off a reboot than it looks. 

  • When fans complain about the overabundance of reboots, particularly superhero reboots, the 2015 Fantastic Four is one of their prime examples. As Variety pointed out at the time, this version of Fantastic Four came out only eight years after the previous one. Since the original Fantastic Four movies weren't themselves huge hits, the producers probably should have waited longer to try again. That Fox was forced to rush production in order to retain the film rights to the characters didn't help either. 

    On top of that, Fantastic Four experienced behind-the-scenes creative struggles that can happen on any film set. On the eve of the premier, director Josh Trank disavowed his own movie via a tweet that he later deleted. 

    But hey, if you were disappointed by the 2015 reboot, here's some good news: at Comic-Con International this year, Marvel announced that the reboot is getting a reboot. Maybe this time it'll all work out. 

    Rotten Tomatoes score: 9% 

    Is this a disgrace to the original?
    Amazon buy button
  • Like many of the other reboots on this list, The Transporter Refueled had the unenviable task of recapturing the success of the original without its original star, Jason Statham. But it wasn't just that Jason Statham's performance in the 2002 Transporter was memorable; it was the breakout role that made him a star. The 2002 version proved that Statham could lead a movie. His replacement, Ed Skrein, who had previously appeared on Game of Thrones Season 3 as Daario Naharis, just wasn't up to the task.  

    The remake would eventually earn back three times its budget, but it still had one of the worst opening weekends in movie history

    Rotten Tomatoes Score: 16%

    Is this a disgrace to the original?
    Amazon buy button
  • When it comes to reboots, the longer the original movie premiered, the more difficult it is for the reboot to be successful. This is because reboots rely heavily on the previous audience's nostalgia to sell tickets. The 1959 Ben-Hur starring Charlton Heston is an all-time classic, but it debuted 60 years ago. By the time a remake came out in 2016, very few of its original audience was around to see it. To put it numerically, 94% of the movie's opening weekend audience was over the age of 25. By contrast, Suicide Squad opened the same weekend with 54% of its audience under 25. 

    Ben-Hur had a lot more issues than timeliness, however.  After 2000's Gladiator, the "swords and sandals" genre hasn't been a hit with audiences. Also, it was heavily marketed to religious audiences, which can turn off secular audiences. And to top it all off, the critics hated it. 

    Rotten Tomatoes score: 25%

    Is this a disgrace to the original?
    Amazon buy button
  • 4

    Alex Cross

    Alex Cross
    Photo: Lionsgate

    Any time a reboot swaps out one of the greatest actors of the 20th and 21st centuries with a comedian making the transition to more serious films, it's facing an uphill fight. While fans enjoyed watching Morgan Freeman match wits with serial slayers in the original Alex Cross films, his replacement, Tyler Perry, is known more for his Madea movies. Critics and fans just weren't convinced.

    Perry also typically writes, produces, and directs his own films in addition to starring in them, but this was one of the rare times when he had relatively little creative control. Alex Cross would end up being Perry's lowest-grossing opening weekend ever. 

    Rotten Tomatoes score: 11%

    Is this a disgrace to the original?
    Amazon buy button