Weirdly Interesting The 23 Most Idiotic Bad-Science Moments in Disaster Movies  

Robert Wabash
4.7k votes 808 voters 230.4k views 24 items Embed

List Rules Only disaster movie science -- geology, astronomy, meteorology, physics, etc.

Hollywood has no time for science! It's too slow/too fast, too dangerous/too benign, and mostly too complicated to be bothered with on the big screen. Disaster movies are the worst offenders of them all.

If you have your fave bad-science moments in any disaster film at all, add it! I want more! MORE! 
1 202 VOTES

A Tsunami Can Come Towards a Disrupting Fault


A Tsunami Can Come Towards a D... is listed (or ranked) 1 on the list The 23 Most Idiotic Bad-Science Moments in Disaster Movies
Photo: via Twitter

Look out! Here comes a tsunami! A gajillion feet high and all frothy and cresty and majestic as it sweeps towards the Golden Gate bridge in San Andreas! 

Hold the phones. Two things. One, the earthquake was on the San Andreas fault -- since that's kind of the whole point and name of the movie. This particular fault is a slip strike fault. It cannot cause the uplift or down-drop required to cause a tsunami even if the fault was out past the coast (and indeed, the San Andreas DOES run out past land by the Golden Gate bridge - but it still couldn't cause that massive wave).

Two, No way come "hell or high water" (haha) can a tsunami be that ginormous right off the continental shelf. It could only be as high as the bay is deep. AND, it wouldn't be in some showy surfer wave... it would be a giant increase in the water level --- imagine a monstrous swelling, not something you can imagine the Point Break dudes surfing. Plus, there would be a large displacement of the water in the bay, sucking it all out towards the incoming, rising swell.

190 12
Is this remarkably bad science?
2 251 VOTES

Suspension Bridges Ignore Physics


Suspension Bridges Ignore Phys... is listed (or ranked) 2 on the list The 23 Most Idiotic Bad-Science Moments in Disaster Movies
Photo: via Wikimedia

Ha ha... sorry, this is a total science-nerd one. But seriously. 

Look at the image here. See the tower on the bridge after the magic microwaves "break through" the Earth's magnetic field (pssst...microwaves can already pass through the magnetic field)? The middle of the Golden Gate Bridge is destroyed and the suspension towers, for some reason, are bending inwards as if the cables in the middle were pushing the two towers apart. 

Fun game for at home: get a rope and two friends. Each of you stand on either side of the rope and pull like you are playing tug-of-war. This is how a suspension bridge works. Now, get another friend to cut the middle of the rope. Do you fall forward when that happens? Or backward? 
Ha ha, you fell down.
218 33
Is this remarkably bad science?
3 246 VOTES

You Can Miss An Approaching Asteroid the Size of Texas


You Can Miss An Approaching As... is listed (or ranked) 3 on the list The 23 Most Idiotic Bad-Science Moments in Disaster Movies
Photo: via Pinterest

Ceres is a real asteroid... well, I guess it's technically a dwarf planetoid. It's also the largest asteroid in our asteroid belt. It's big enough that you can actually see it with your naked eye if you know where to look and there's not too much ambient light where you're standing. Ceres is 900km across and this new, never-before-seen asteroid in Armageddon is supposedly the size of Texas. That's 1600km. in case you don't carry that kind of info around with you. 

So. The movie says that it's about 18 days away, which puts it closer to Earth than Ceres is in real life. It's both closer and bigger than the asteroid we can already see without a telescope. The math says that it would be 3-4,000 times brighter than Ceres. The MOVIE, on the other hand, says that only 15 telescopes in the world could have spotted something that anyone who wasn't completely blind and not wearing a neck brace could have seen for themselves. 

Right there. Up in the sky. Any time someone looked up.
208 38
Is this remarkably bad science?
4 270 VOTES

Earthquake Cracks Think They're People


Earthquake Cracks Think They&#... is listed (or ranked) 4 on the list The 23 Most Idiotic Bad-Science Moments in Disaster Movies
Photo: via Imgur

I guess some earthquakes are sentient? And hold grudges? How else do you explain their uncanny ability to sense a moving vehicle or running person and follow just behind them? 

Not only do these Krazy Kracks do vengeful stuff like chase people, but in real life they just don't really happen like that. Earthquake movies like 10.5 and San Andreas are big fans of monstrous cracks opening up so cars and people and stuff can fall in... but in the case of a strike-slip fault (like the San Andreas) these things don't happen. The two sides of the fault are scraping against each other in opposite directions - - the friction is what causes the shaking. If the earth pulled apart like in the photo above there would be no friction. And no shaking. But it remains the go-to visual for hollywood when they want to depict earthquakes.

There are divergent plate boundaries that pull away from each other, but these are slow movements that occur where continental plates meet and create massive rift valleys. Like in Africa and in the middle of the Atlantic. 
225 45
Is this remarkably bad science?